6.Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction

Facts^ⓘ which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part^ⓘ of the same^ⓘ transaction^ⓘ, are relevant whether they occurred at the same^ⓘ time and place or at different times and places.Illustrations (a)A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the by-standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after it as to form part^ⓘ of the transaction^ⓘ, is a relevant fact. (b)A is accused of waging war against the [Government of India] [Substituted by A.O. 1950, for "Queen".]by taking part^ⓘ in an armed insurrection in which property is destroyed, troops are attacked, and goals are broken open. The occurrence of these facts^ⓘ is relevant, as forming^ⓘ part^ⓘ of the general transaction^ⓘ, though A may not have been present at all of them. (c)A sues B for a libel contained in a letter forming^ⓘ part^ⓘ of a correspondence. Letters between the part^ⓘies relating to the subject out of which the libel arose, and forming^ⓘ part^ⓘ of the correspondence in which it is contained, are relevant facts^ⓘ, though they do not contain the libel itself. (d)The question is, whether certain goods ordered from B were delivered to A. The goods were delivered to several intermediate persons successively. Each delivery is a relevant fact.